🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed recent overtures had come from go-betweens to resume negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader declaring the sites had been eliminated. Afterward, EU nations employed their privilege to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be resurrected in some form if negotiations resume.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but in private Tehran representatives claim they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, the foreign minister said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He stated the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making faith challenging to restore.

Dialogue Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had repeatedly sought to enforce their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final resolution to address disputes, but its standards, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a reply in the same language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more united, and more backing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."